|
Meetings:
Q&A Forum Questions
|
|
Tuesday, 12 April 2011 19:55 |
- Can someone from the RTA explain the criteria used to determine which part of the Pacific Highway have bitumen and which are just the noisier concrete considering Moorland is the only settlement from Kew to Sydney that does not have the less noisy finish and in fact that there are sealed parts not even near houses or settlement?
- Can someone from The RTA explain why the flyover at Johns River has a footpath providing pedestrian /cycleway access and that at Forest Road does not despite the fact that the pacific Highway splits at the point two parts of a community with many children and people requiring such safe access across the Highway to get to school, soccer fields, tennis courts etc.?
- Can the RTA provide the results of the latest noise tests and what actions are proposed to alleviate the issue of increased road noise?
- Can the RTA explain why the community of Moorland should be worse off after the Highway upgrade because increased noise is impacting on the amenities of a far greater number of residents?
- Does the RTA in any way accept that increase in noise levels can be more than simply increased noise above a defined level at any one point?
- Can the RTA explain what is the financial difference between a Give Way sign and a stop sign and if there is no financial difference why for the sake of community safety or even peace of mind why the turn off at Hannam Vale Road should not have a stop sign?
- Can someone from THE RTA offer any explanation as to the high number of job losses that have resulted from closing of businesses resulting from the bypassing of Coopernook, Moorland and Kew and why these are so much greater than the various Environmental Impact Studies for the RTA suggested?
- Can the RTA indicate what actions they believe they should take to compensate local communities for loss of jobs resulting from the bypassing of communities?
|
|
Last Updated on Wednesday, 15 June 2011 19:48 |
